Read this article to learn:
- Federal regulation that does (and doesn’t) attract investment in Digital Infrastructure
- The importance of taxation regimes that facilitate sale and leasebacks, releasing MNOs' capital for spectrum and network extension
- Why slow or unrealistically costly permitting has led to CALA’s problems with unpermitted sites
- The need for an independent industry voice to position towercos as the solution to many of these problems
The regulation of the telecom tower industry might politely be described as a work in progress. In some countries, government appetite to attract investment into Digital Infrastructure and the Digital Economy translates into policies that attract network investment by MNOs and towercos alike, but well-intentioned policies often backfire due to the challenges enforcing policy and…
Towercos and MNOs are entitled to a free subscription. Please login with your usual credentials or apply for a new account.
This content is for Subscribers only
To read the full article either login below or follow the link to subscribe.
Announcing an enhanced TowerXchange Journal – subscribe now!
Our new improved offering will allow you to access the insight and analysis you have come to rely on from TowerXchange – but in a format that suits you.
We would love you to continue to receive the TowerXchange Journal by subscribing, and to contribute to the knowledge sharing and information resource we have built up in the form of over 2.5mn words of research and almost 1,000 CXO interviews. An individual subscription costs GBP£2,500 per year, with corporate subscriptions priced according to scale.
